DOMAN训练的得与失

吴思奇爸爸

      接触DOMAN的训练方法是个很偶然的因素，大约是2006年5月份的时候，我们带奇奇去小区社康中心补打疫苗，有位同在排队的孩子妈妈看到奇奇的恐怖的头，给我们推荐了台湾版本的DOMAN的书《如何让宝宝身强体健》。托香港的朋友买回来后，我们有一搭没一搭地看，学会了多让孩子趴着以及使用腹爬槽的观念。后来又找到了另外的几本书，DOMAN老人家在书里描述了很多神奇的康复例子，让我怦然心动，那时我们对奇奇的预后并不乐观，对脑瘫的认识也很肤浅，一想起脑瘫，直觉就是那种只能躺在床上坐在轮椅里的情形，当时想着即便身体的活动能力受很大的影响，如果以后奇奇的精神和内心是自由丰富的，那也是个弥补。所以，就一直在寻找哪里能采用DOMAN的方法进行训练，当时还托了再加拿大的同学去打听美国费城的机构，后来无意中在网上查到了国内有机构在采用这个方法训练孩子，2006年底我们带着奇奇去恩宇做了评估，2007年初开始了DOMAN训练的历程。

    奇奇妈妈带着奇奇在厦门，算是比较认真刻苦的，从2007年3月到2009年9月，指导奇奇训练的唯一方法就是DOMAN的理论和做法。那段时间里，奇奇确实有了很大的进步，学会了腹爬和四爬，做了大量的语言输入和字词输入以及百科输入，那时我们是DMAN训练忠实的拥戴者，除了在博客里全程记录和介绍DOMAN给奇奇带来的每一点进步，每次有人来看奇奇了，我们还很骄傲地让奇奇表演他能认识多少字，能分辨多少百科图卡，能接多少歌谣。

    客观地说，DOMAN的训练给奇奇带来了积极的变化，现在奇奇在很多方面的表现，也得益于当初DOMAN训练打下的良好基础。但是有得必有失，七年以后，我们再回过头来看，有些真相逐渐明朗，一些迷雾一点点散开，可以对DOMAN的训练做一些客观的评判了。

    感知觉的发展是我们人类各种能力发展的基础，各种感觉通路的信息输入在合适的强度、频率和持续时间的操作下，改变了大脑神经通路的发育，改善了大脑功能，从而提高了能力输出的效率和质量，这是DOMAN训练方法的基础理论。现在各种训练理论都强调了感觉刺激和感觉输入在学习方面的基础作用，但是把感知觉训练形成一个系统完善的操作方法的，现在仍然首推DOMAN。配合改善大脑运作的环境比如营养、供氧、排毒等方法，DOMAN的训练形成了一个既有理论又有操作实践的体系。我们在奇奇身上实践过，训练室成立后，很长一段时间我们也是采用的DOMAN的训练方法，可以肯定地说，DOMAN训练对大多数孩子的基础神经发育是有帮助的。

    DOMAN训练强调感觉刺激，强调大量输入，强调改善大脑供氧和营养，强调生活环境对孩子大脑发育的影响，这些都是建立在科学依据上的理论和做法。在孩子大脑发育的早期（通常是三岁前），这种通过感觉通路给予大量刺激的方法对大脑功能的改善确实是必要的，即便是正常的没有脑损伤的孩子，他的最初基本能力也是透过反复的感觉刺激和经验积累而获得的，只是因为他们没有运动障碍和感知觉障碍，只要环境允许，学习就成了一件自然而然的事情。有脑损伤的孩子，主动获取这种学习机会的能力受到限制，就需要通过训练的方式去弥补。

    奇奇在最初的三年里，通过DOMAN的训练，取得了不错的效果，打下了比较好的基础，这也是我当初大力推介这种方法的原因。但是凡事都有两面性，奇奇的大运动，在进入四爬之后，在我们转向专业的运动训练之前，却一直没有突破，直到奇奇快四岁了，我们接触了董老师的运动训练理念和指导，接触了平衡疗法，才有了突破。他的认知水平和智力反应，也是后来我们采用了更多的输出的训练，才有了实质性的提升。

    有很多家长，向我咨询DOMAN的训练如何适用于自己孩子的身上，在互助与希望论坛上，也曾经对DOMAN的训练有过不大不小激烈的争论，我把我的认识在这里总结一下：

    一、就像这篇博客前面说了一大堆所要阐述的，DOMAN的训练对孩子的基础神经发育是有帮助的，它通过大量的刺激和信息输入，改善了我们的感觉通路，这是我们学习的基础条件，在训练室，我们现在把DOMAN的训练方法归类于基础训练，也是这种考虑。

    二、DOMAN训练的最佳时期是孩子的神经发育年龄三岁之前，在此时期内，孩子的逻辑思维能力还没有得到发展，大量的信息输入既改善了神经通路的发育，也给孩子的知识库补充了大量的库存。但是孩子的神经发育年龄到了三岁以后，即便还采用DOMAN的训练，也需要改变信息输入的方式，否则容易造成孩子思维的机械性和刻板性。三岁以后，更多地应该给孩子一些逻辑思维能力的训练，强调的是思考的能力，而不再是单纯的信息输入。

    三、对大多数家长来说，DOMAN的训练更多的应该是一种精神和习惯，这种精神就是父母随时给孩子大量的信息输入，包括和孩子对话、读书、唱接歌谣、触觉刺激、视觉输入、本体输入等。鉴于DOMAN在国内和国际的传播现状，很多孩子也许没有机会采用全面系统的DOMAN训练，但是我们可以不把它神秘化，抓住其中的本质，很多孩子都可以从中受益。训练室的一些老家长，把随时随地给孩子信息输入变成了一种习惯，即便离开了训练室的训练环境，仍然可以将这种习惯和做法贯穿于孩子的生活中。

    四、有运动障碍和严重运动落后的孩子，一定要同时结合运动的训练方法，属于脑瘫的运动障碍的孩子，更应该以运动训练为主，DOMAN的感知觉的训练为辅。这是个方向性的问题，很多有运动障碍的孩子，在这个上面走了弯路，错过了最佳的运动训练时期，造成了不可挽回的遗憾。现在回过头反思奇奇的运动，如果奇奇在学会了四爬以后，能像后来一样进行专业的运动训练，而不是每天以爬多少米为目标，我想奇奇的走路能力应该比现在要好得多，可惜，因为我们的愚昧和某机构的固步自封，奇奇在地上爬了两年多，这是个惨痛的教训。

    对奇奇的DOMAN训练的得与失的总结，仅仅是站在我现在的认识水平上写的，仅供有心的家长和同行参考，如果有不同的意见，欢迎多交流。

本帖最后由 小荷尖尖角 于 2012-1-1 18:06 编辑

我是190#的。我再次提醒大家选择译著一定要选择正版的。翻译上稍有偏差就可能使描述的内容不正确，使用其内容可能对孩子造成伤害。
      我粗略看了3#的“从网上看到的几篇读后感”，对照我在美国费城人类脑潜能开发研究所的5天听课及在恩宇训练的体会，发现有好几处错误：
1.        研究所的发展历史不是25年，而是五十多年。
2.        注意力集中缺陷、多动、斜弱视、自闭、失语、脑瘫、癫痫、先天眼睛盲及耳聋、瘫痪、外伤导致的植物人等统称为脑损伤。脑损伤并不只是指“脑部的异常可能发生于出生前或出生后的意外事故或生产过程受到伤害所致”。导致脑损伤的因素很多，比如：怀孕时母体风疹、病毒抗体高、怀孕时母亲年龄大容易引起染色体异常、重金属中毒（如铅、汞、砷、镉钴、钒、铊等，中毒的原因：环境、饮食的影响并且身体排毒能力较差。）、滥用抗生素（包括过多食用带抗生素的食品比如牛奶、养鸡场的鸡鸭，而自身免疫力又较差不能排泄的）、接触放射性的东西、长期食用身体过敏的食品、过量食用甜食精白大米小麦面粉，并且自身免疫力低下，致使肠道霉菌过度增生，如果肠道霉菌过度增生又打了五连体的防疫针那就更糟糕了。
3.        大脑发育有七个阶段：第一阶段：早期脑干及脊髓。第二阶段：脑干及早期皮质下。三，中脑及皮质下。四，初始皮质。五，早期皮质。六，初级皮质，七，高级皮质。大脑的七个发育阶段涉及大脑的不同主控部部位。大脑发育的这七个阶段时间上个体差异较大，但大致上可以划分如下：第一阶段发育是在刚出生时，第二阶段2.5个月时、依次类推分别是：7个月、12个月、18个月、36个月、72个月。并非“脑中可分四个主要部份，分别掌管身体不同部位的动作”
4.        “治疗脑伤儿童就是把孩子放到地板上。当脑伤儿童被趴放在地板上，他们就像正常的小孩一样，无须额外的治疗， 他们依循和正常孩子的步骤， 慢慢蠕行和爬行”的说法是不够全面的。把孩子趴着放在地板上是非常好的，作用：可以使孩子视野开阔，可以让他东张西望，看到喜欢的东西可以激起他爬过去拿起来的欲望并为之努力，而不用躺着整天看着天花板；躺着会压迫后脑勺的神经。正常儿童当然可以“把他放在地板上无须额外的治疗”。但脑损伤儿童刚学爬行时往往要帮助他，越早帮助他爬行越有助于康复。比如小婴儿时把他放在斜坡上练习他爬行，严重的脑瘫并且年龄较大的孩子刚开始要借助爬行器、防翻滚器爬行。当然正常小孩也是越早练习爬行越好，研究所把孩子练习爬行的时间定在出生后就可以开始了，当然如果这时练习，不管什么样的孩子就要借助斜坡了。
5.        “塑行过程”准确的说法是“模式训练”。模式训练分为两种：单侧模式训练、交替式模式训练。单侧模式训练就是3#的家长提到的，也就是同手同脚的。交替式模式训练是腿和手臂交叉的。孩子具体要哪种模式训练，须要专家的指导。每天做模式的频率和单次时间也因人而异，一般是每人每天4-8次，每次1-5分钟。
6.        讯息的接受与表达要正常发挥的话，必须打通人体的输入通道和输出通道。
人体输入通道有五个：视觉、听觉、触觉、嗅觉、味觉。嗅觉和味觉不重要，不必去刻意训练。输出通道有三个：运动能力、语言能力、手的能力。脑损伤儿童往往视觉、听觉、触觉都有不同程度的损伤。如视觉上会表现出弱视、斜视、内视、有的甚至盲。听觉上表现出对声音不敏感或过度敏感，如对声音听而不闻、特别怕声音、对刺耳的声音表现出过度恐惧。触觉上也表现出不敏感或过度敏感。如触觉过度敏感的孩子不喜欢你拥抱、不喜欢梳头、洗头、洗澡。触觉上不敏感或过度敏感可以听恩宇特制的音乐加以改善和康复。
打通输入通道：只有在专家的指导下，根据血液报告配置营养品、控制不该吃的食物，4天一轮换食物、听特制的音乐、有针对性的运动（包括：带口罩、模式训练、悬梯、手膝爬、腹爬、跑步）、刺激头部、捏积、非药物脱敏排毒等才能打通输入通路。特别提醒戴口罩是非常严格的事情，不能仿效其他孩子，要医生根据小孩的肺活量定出戴口罩的精确时间，时间戴少了起不到增加脑供氧量的效果，时间戴多了会有危险。
只有输入通道打通了输出通道才会正常工作。打通输出通道的训练主要是阅读、对话、听指令、听故事、唐诗、听歌、听百科条目、生活自理、拼图、画画、写字等。阅读主要是闪字卡、闪百科图、闪数学点卡和数学等式、看家制书等。当然输入和输出训练要同步进行。
   7， 斜视、内视主要是脑不具有汇聚功能。先天盲、弱视、斜视、内视是脑发育的问题，不是眼睛出了毛病，治疗这些病不能用眼睛开刀的办法。治疗盲、弱视研究所主要用的是光感刺激、运动刺激、饮食调整、营养品配置等。斜视、内视治疗办法主要是闪手电筒、爬行、模式、饮食调整、营养品配置等。
       我们人两只眼睛看到的同一个东西其实是两个的，经过大脑整合汇聚后看到的是一个东西。如果大脑汇聚出了问题，看到的东西是两个的或者是叠影的。斜视的孩子为了尽可能看到的东西不是两个的或叠影的，他就要选择主要用一只眼睛看，放弃另一只眼睛的作用，不让两眼同时看，所以他会把其中一只眼睛偏到一边去。
       脑损伤孩子因为常常汇聚有问题，看到的东西是叠影的。所以他们看到的东西是模糊的，感觉不到物体的深度、广度，所以常常会摔倒、碰撞。
8，“一个脑部受损的儿童，天生几已注定是个输家”的说法是错误的。大脑损伤和智力之间没有必然的关系。大脑是靠不断地使用、刺激才发达的。如果把爱因斯坦从小放在那些脑损伤儿童修养所里，爱因斯坦长大了必然是呆呆的。相反给一个脑损伤儿童尽早进行积极有针对性的治疗训练他完全有可能智力正常或者超常。脑损伤儿童的有些脑细胞是死亡了，那些死亡的脑细胞不可以使它复活。但人的脑细胞有一亿多个，真正被开发使用的脑细胞很少，我们可以通过有针对性的训练，开发那些没有在工作的脑细胞，也可以通过不断的刺激正在工作中脑细胞，使还在工作的脑细胞发育得优良些。事实证明：通过饮食控制、营养品的调节、训练，会比不训练前的脑细胞个头大、蛋白制含量高。脑细胞质量好了，人就聪明了。
     最后我要申明：以上是我在美国人类脑潜能开发研究所听课以及在恩宇训练所学到的。没有要跟3#争论谁是谁非的意思。大家一起切磋，共同学习。感谢楼主、3号的热情。是他们激起我发表这篇评论的愿望。

gelihao

饮食控制、营养品调节可以具体说下吗？吃点什么？

lyjyanhuo

奇奇爸爸，给你发了邮件一直没有得到回复，今天看到你的贴子，所以在这给你留言，麻烦你抽时间看一下。谢谢！

popo

比如模式，对我们就没用，国外对模式有很多说法，说是‘伪科学’。对家长而言，只能取对自己孩子有用的，而有用没用，要试过才知道。多么痛的领悟

popo

而轮换饮食，从来没进行过，直到上周开始，显著改善了豆豆的胃口和睡眠。所以轮换饮食对我们很重要！现在我们要试试斜坡冲下法，有用没用，用过才知！基本上，DOMAN对认知这一块应该是有帮助的-综合网评。而对我们也要试过才知。

popo

ABM主张让孩子仰卧。。。。。头晕了吧

popo

对模式的质疑声：

Scientific criticism (wiki)

The American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Children With Disabilities issued warnings regarding patterning, one of the IAHP's therapies for brain injured children, as early as 1968[24] and repeated in 1982.[25] Their latest cautionary policy statement was in 1999, which was reaffirmed in 2002 and 2005. It stated:[2]
This statement reviews patterning as a treatment for children with neurologic impairments. This treatment is based on an outmoded and oversimplified theory of brain development. Current information does not support the claims of proponents that this treatment is efficacious, and its use continues to be unwarranted.... [T]he demands and expectations placed on families are so great that in some cases their financial resources may be depleted substantially and parental and sibling relationships could be stressed.
Since 1960 the IAHP has published multiple studies professing to show the effectiveness of the program. These studies, upon review, have not stood up to scientific scrutiny and have not been reproduced by other sources.[26] In 1978, Sara Sparrow (professor emerita and senior research scientist at Yale Child Study Center)[27] and Edward Zigler (professor emeritus at the Department of Psychology at Yale University,[28] one of the principle architects of the US federal Head Start program and recipient of the 2008 APA Award For Outstanding Lifetime Contribution To Psychology)[29] evaluated patterning as a treatment for retarded children. They concluded that no evidence was found for an improvement over that which would be expected of children given attention or that expected of any child as they mature; the patterning method cannot be recommended for seriously retarded children.[30] Zigler wrote a 1981 editorial entitled "A plea to end the use of the patterning treatment for retarded children", which emphasized the harmful effect the treatment has by raising false hopes and increasing parental guilt.[26][31] According to Edward Zigler and Robert Hodapp, in their book Understanding Mental Retardation, the Doman-Delacato method has major flaws:[17]
The recapitulation theory it is built upon has been discarded by the natural sciences.
The suggestion that motor development has stages, which depend on earlier developments, is not supported by evidence.
There is no evidence that passive movements by a child, forced to engage in crawling movements, affects neurological organization.
Children who voluntarily perform an activity (such as sitting or walking) before mastering preceding stages, are prevented from doing so by the IAHP—possibly harming the child.
The only scientific paper published by Doman on patterning (in 1960) contains many methodological errors and overstatements of findings. The study had no control group so was unable to compare with children who would naturally show some developmental progress over time. When independent scientists compared the results with the progress made by untreated children, the "results of patterning appear singularly unimpressive".
The patterning procedure may be harmful to its participants (the parents experience guilt at being unable to achieve the intensive program required) and other family members through neglect.
It is cruel to offer hope through a program that is impossible to fully carry out.
In addition to the American Academy of Pediatrics, a number of other organizations have issued cautionary statements about claims for efficacy of this therapy.[2] These include the executive committee of the American Academy for Cerebral Palsy,[32] the United Cerebral Palsy Association of Texas,[33] the Canadian Association for Retarded Children[34] the executive board of the American Academy of Neurology,[35] and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.[36]
A 2006 retrospective study of 21 children by the IAHP and others of children with cortical visual impairment found significant improvement after use of the program; the study had no control group and has not been replicated.[37]
Kathleen Ann Quill, in her book Teaching children with autism: What parents want,[38] says "thousands of families have wasted time and money to follow Doman's methods." She goes on to say "Professionals have nothing to learn from Doman's pseudoscientific treatments, but they have plenty to learn from his marketing strategy", which is aimed at parent's "hopes and fantasies".
Martha Farrell Erickson and Karen Marie Kurz-Riemer discuss Early Intervention with "Normal Infants and Toddlers" in their book "Infants Toddlers and Families".[39] They claim Doman "capitalized on the desires of members of the "baby boom" generation to maximise their children's intellectual potential" and "encouraged parents to push their infants to develop maximum brain power". However his programs were "based on shaky or nonexistent research evidence" and "most child development experts at the time described many aspects of the program as useless and perhaps even harmful."
Martin Robards also cites widespread criticism in his book Running a Team for Disabled Children and Their Families[1] but concedes that Doman and Delacato caused paediatricians and therapists to recognize that early intervention programs are needed.
Steven Novella, assistant professor of Neurology at Yale University School of Medicine, criticized the technique as follows:[40]
The Doman-Delacato patterning technique is premised on a bankrupt and discarded theory and has failed when tested under controlled conditions. Its promotion with unsubstantiated claims can cause significant financial and emotional damage. Such claims can instill false hope in many people who are already plagued by guilt and depression, setting them up for a further disappointment, guilt, and feelings of inadequacy. The process can also waste their time, energy, emotion, and money. These resources may be taken away from their children. Parents can also be distracted from dealing with the situation in other practical ways and coping psychologically as a family with the reality of having a brain-injured or mentally retarded child. Parents are encouraged, in fact, to remain in a state of denial while they are pursuing a false cure.[40]

^ a b Robards, Martin F (June 1994). Running a Team for Disabled Children and Their Families. Cambridge University Press. p. 150. ISBN 0-901260-99-1.
^ a b c Committee on Children with Disabilities, American Academy of Pediatrics (1999). "The treatment of neurologically impaired children using patterning". Pediatrics 104 (5 Pt 1): 1149–51. doi:10.1542/peds.104.5.1149. PMID 10545565.
^ "IN-REPORT", Institutes for The Achievement of Human Potential
^ Doman RJ, Spitz EB, Zucman E, Delacato CH, Doman G (1960). "Children with severe brain injuries. Neurological organization in terms of mobility". JAMA 174: 257–62. PMID 13817361.
^ SQUAREONE PUBLISHERS http://www.squareonepublishers.com/gen_authors.html#Doman
^ The Society of Neurological Surgeons: http://www.societyns.org/society/bio.aspx?MemberID=7450
^ Scott F Gilbert (2006). "Ernst Haeckel and the Biogenetic Law". Developmental Biology, 8th edition. Sinauer Associates. Retrieved 2008-05-03. "Eventually, the Biogenetic Law had become scientifically untenable."
^ Scherzer, Alfred L (November 2000). Early Diagnosis and Interventional Therapy in Cerebral Palsy. Marcel Dekker. p. 376. ISBN 0-8247-6006-9.
^ Glenn Doman and Dr. Ralph Peligra, "Ictogenesis: the origin of seizures in humans. A new look at an old theory." Medical Hypotheses Volume 10, Issue 1. pp. Pages 129-132 (January 2003)
^ Glenn Doman (2005-04-25) [1974]. What To Do About Your Brain-injured Child (Revised ed.). Square One Publishers. ISBN 0-7570-0186-6.
^ Glenn Doman, Janet Doman (2005-10-12) [1964]. How To Teach Your Baby To Read (Revised ed.). Square One Publishers. ISBN 0-7570-0185-8.
^ Glenn Doman, Janet Doman (2005-08-30) [1979]. How To Teach Your Baby Math (Revised ed.). Square One Publishers. ISBN 0-7570-0184-X.
^ Glenn J. Doman, Janet Doman (2005-11-05) [1983]. How To Multiply Your Baby's Intelligence (Revised ed.). Square One Publishers. ISBN 0-7570-0183-1.
^ Douglas Doman (2006). How to Teach Your Baby to Swim: From Birth to Age Six. Square One Publishers. ISBN 0-7570-0198-X.
^ "IAHP website". Iahp.org. Retrieved 2010-03-09.
^ "Upcoming Courses". iahp.org. Retrieved 2010-03-09.
^ a b Zigler, Edward; Hodapp, Robert M (August 1986). Understanding Mental Retardation. Cambridge University Press. p. 306. ISBN 0-521-31878-5.
^ Janet Doman in an article "The Honorable Corps of Patterners" on the IAHP website.
^ The Institutes Developmental Profile, on the IAHP web site.
^ The IAHP website:http://www.iahp.org/How-to-Multiply-Your-Baby.328.0.html
^ a b Glenn Doman and Dr. Ralph Peligra, "Ictogenesis: the origin of seizures in humans. A new look at an old theory." Medical Hypotheses Volume 10, Issue 1. pp. Pages 129-132 (January 2003)
^ Roselise H. Wilkinson, MD. "Detoxification from anticonvulsants: 25 years of experience with brain-injured children". IAHP. Retrieved 2008-04-29. "...our rationale is also based on our strong belief that seizures serve a physiological function, as do the many other defense mechanisms of the body. Coughing, vomiting, diarrhea, fainting, and fever could also be viewed as dysfunctions, but we know that they are designed to protect the organism. So also are seizures. A seizure is an activity of great metabolic activity of the brain, and during its presence cerebral blood flow increases, providing more oxygen and glucose and increasing excitatory amino acids necessary for establishing the neuronal wiring and function."
^ Roselise H. Wilkinson, MD. "Detoxification from anticonvulsants: 25 years of experience with brain-injured children". IAHP. Retrieved 2008-04-29. "Additional measures are: I. Optimize respiratory function to increase oxygen availability. II. Masking--a procedure of rebreathing for short periods to gain CO2 enrichment resulting in a favorable acid base balance and to increase cerebral circulation. This technique is useful to shorten individual seizures as well. III. Restriction of sodium and liquids to prevent fluid retention and increased intracranial pressure. IV. Excellent nutrition to maintain good health and structures and to provide for energy and all needed vitamins, minerals, and neurotransmitter precursors. V. Magnesium and calcium supplements to promote central nervous system membrane stability. VI. Pyridoxine to support GABA and to increase the efficient use of oxygen by the brain. VII. Control the environment: Pollution, toxins, hyperthermia, reduced oxygen availability. VIII. Maintain excellent health--avoidance of infections, etc."
^ American Academy of Pediatrics. Doman-Delacato treatment of neurologically handicapped children. AAP Newsletter. June 1, 1968(suppl)
^ American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on Children With Disabilities. The Doman-Delacato treatment of neurologically handicapped children. Pediatrics. 1982; 70:810-812. PMID 6182521
^ a b Holm VA (1983). "A western version of the Doman-Delacato treatment of patterning for developmental disabilities". West J Med 139 (4): 553–6. PMC 1021589. PMID 6196919.
^ "Sara S. Sparrow, Ph.D., Yale Child Study Center: Yale School of Medicine". Childstudycenter.yale.edu. Retrieved 2010-03-09.
^ "Edward F Zigler, Yale Psychology Faculty". Yale.edu. Retrieved 2010-03-09.
^ Edward Zigler Receives 2008 APA Award For Outstanding Lifetime Contribution To Psychology Medical News Today. 14 August 2008.
^ Sparrow S, Zigler E. Evaluation of a patterning treatment for retarded children. Pediatrics. 1978; 62:137-150. PMID 693151.
^ Zigler E A plea to end the use of the patterning treatment for retarded children. Am J Orthopsychiatry. 1981; 51:388-390. PMID 7258304
^ American Academy for Cerebral Palsy. Doman-Delacato treatment of neurologically handicapped children. Statement of Executive Committee. Rosemont, IL: American Academy for Cerebral Palsy; February 15, 1965
^ United Cerebral Palsy Association of Texas. The Doman-Delacato Treatment of Neurologically Handicapped Children [information bulletin, undated]. Austin, TX: United Cerebral Palsy Association of Texas
^ Canadian Association for Retarded Children. Institutes for the Achievement of Human Potential. Ment Retard. Fall 1965:27-28
^ American Academy of Neurology and American Academy of Pediatrics Joint Executive Board Statement. The Doman-Delacato treatment of neurologically handicapped children. Neurology. 1967; 17:637
^ American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. Doman-Delacato treatment of neurologically handicapped children. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1968; 49:183-186. PMID 4296733
^ Malkowicz DE, Myers G, Leisman G (2006). "Rehabilitation of cortical visual impairment in children". Int J Neurosci 116 (9): 1015–33. doi:10.1080/00207450600553505. PMID 16861165.
^ Quill, Kathleen Ann (June 1995). "page 57". Teaching Children With Autism. Thomson Delmar Learning. p. 336. ISBN 0-8273-6269-2.
^ Erickson, Martha Farrell; Kurz-Riemer, Karen Marie (March 2002). "page 17". Infants Toddlers and Families. Guilford Press. p. 204. ISBN 1-57230-778-1.
^ a b Novella S (2008). "Psychomotor patterning: a critical look". Quackwatch. Retrieved 2008-10-23.
^ Pauling, Linus (November 1978). Ralph Pelligra, ed.. ed. "Orthomolecular enhancement of human development" (PDF). Human Neurological Development: Past, Present, and Future. A Joint Symposium Sponsored by NASA/Ames Research Center and the Institutes for the Achievement of Human Potential. NASA CP 2063: 47–51.
^ Review by Jean Clark of "Dart: Man of Science and Grit" by Frances Wheelhouse and Kathaleen S. Smithford, published in STATNews vol. 6, issue 11, September 2003.
^ "Palm Springs Life". Officiallizaminnelli.com. Retrieved 2010-03-09.
^ http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0591485/otherworks

violetshu4

只有在专家的指导下，根据血液报告配置营养品、控制不该吃的食物，4天一轮换食物、听特制的音乐、有针对性的运动 奇奇爸爸这个是什么意思？ 特制营养品是什么 特制音乐又是什么？能具体解释清楚吗？

吴思奇爸爸

关于营养品，我了解得不多，所以在我们这里只会建议家长给孩子补充必要的维生素和矿物质，如果有明显的重金属问题或者肠道问题，我们会建议孩子去做这方面的检查，根据检查结果做排毒排重金属的治疗，这个目前国内还比较少专业的机构和专业的人员，一般都需要去香港。在现在的生存环境下，基本每个人都会有重金属中毒和食物过敏的问题，所以，不是每个孩子都需要去做这个治疗，最近我可能会在博客里写写我对这方面的看法。控制不该吃的东西，一方面是有些食物容易让孩子过敏，吃了会影响孩子的情绪甚至大脑，另一方面，有一些食物确定是对孩子来说是垃圾食品，比如可乐、牛奶（这个是有争议的，但很多专家建议不要给孩子喝牛奶，因为现在已经没有放心奶源）、糖、油炸食品。特制音乐，在杜曼的体系中，用的是美国EASE的处理过的音乐，对某些频率做了过滤的处理，有助于改善耳朵的听力问题，我们现在在使用TOAMTIS的音乐，最近我在接受这方面的培训，也会在博客里做介绍的。

原大宝妈妈

请问。思奇爸爸，你的训练中心在哪里？能说具体点吗？我小孩子是婴儿痉挛症，发作未完全控制住，每日发作1--3下《总计》，能去你哪里康复吗？

原大宝妈妈

急盼回复

吴思奇爸爸

我们是在深圳坂田万科四季花城六期东门对面，现在一个新的地方也要马上开始运作，都在深圳。有婴儿痉挛症的孩子，首先要通过治疗控制发作，杜曼的训练里也有一些方法可以帮助改善，但是打运动的训练一定也要同步进行，身体机能和大脑供氧改善了，才能根本性地改善发作的问题，如果你离深圳近的话，可以过来我们这里看看。

随然

游客 140.206.255.x 发表于 2013-1-23 22:41
本帖最后由 小荷尖尖角 于 2012-1-1 18:06 编辑

我是190#的。我再次提醒大家选择译著一定要选择正版的 ...

你是什么时候去费城杜曼研究所的？我今年夏天去听了一个星期课。

墩墩爸

谢谢奇奇爸，等我们孩子痉挛控制住一定去深圳看看

依然妈

奇奇爸，我想问一下孩子5岁了去做Doman会太晚吗

小淼淼的妈妈

奇奇爸爸，7个月脑发育不良的宝宝，适合杜曼吗？

吴思奇爸爸

杜曼的方法可以吸取其中的精华，对三岁以下的孩子都可以用，重点是学习其中的大量感觉输入。